James m. mcpherson crossroads of freedom antietam Essay

James m. mcpherson joint of freedom antietam - Essay ExampleMcPherson lay out a chronological account of this battle scratch line with the events that prompted the state of struggle, how the battle was fought, and its aftermath. This paper seeks to explore how the battle of Antietam changed the run away of Americas Civil War in accordance with McPherson views. The battle of Antietam is indeed remembered as the deadliest and bloodiest day in Americas history. However, this day in addition has a lot of significance in civil fight since it changed the course of the war completely as pointed out by McPherson (2). This is seen right from the first chapter where McPherson lays out shifting fortunes witnessed during the early years before the conflict. Here, McPherson reveals how some(prenominal) the sum and Confederate and European powers were affected by the events of the first years of the battle. In this regard, McPherson Juxtaposes the success of pith forces in the early mon ths of the conflict to Lincoln governments poor handling of Trent Affair and bankruptcy of Union forces to conquer the Southern Army. Reflecting the failed Union efforts in the Trent Affair, McPherson argues that the failure of Confederates to use King like to mount a blockage marked the turning point of the war in its early years of 1862. This is because it gave the Union soldiers the opportunity to repel the Confederate invasion of the north. In this regard, McPherson mentions the usual sources, which included Mary Boykin Chesnut, rear end B. Jones, Charles Francis Adams, and Elizabeth Blair Lee (McPherson 6). Chapter two of the book gives accounts of the increase southern fortunes and the tensions that resulted thereof. McPherson titled this Taking off the Kid Gloves, June-July of 1862 (McPherson 17). In this regard, McPherson gives an account of how growing support for the views of Confederates among European powers turned the course of the battle. McPherson argues that failur e of Federals to succeed increased the loyalty level of Union forces to wage a different war. This is because the failure by the Federals pointed the weakness of the confederates thereby increasing the morale of the Union forces to continue waging a strong battle, according to McPherson (19). In fact, McPherson noted that the battle of Antietam gave signs of Unions victory in the war with many Confederate forces perishing in the war. McPherson argues that the battle of Antietam also changed the course of the war since it marked the point where the European powers began seeking for diplomatic recognition, which later resulted in a negotiated village leading to the recognition of independence. McPherson also argued that the victory of the Union soldiers in the battle of Antietam also changed the course of the war in the sense that it resulted to the issuance of the Emancipation Proclamation by President Lincoln, which changed the war into a war against slavery (McPherson 26). Accordi ng to McPherson, Emancipation Proclamation increased the need to re-ignite Northern enthusiasm through radicalization the war. In fact, McPherson argues that the establishment of an army under Union General John Pope was a move towards a total battle on the interest of the Southern, particularly property. McPherson noted that this entirely changed the course of the civil war to war against slavery and property (McPherson 41). McPherson explains this giving an account of the events that took place in the